Fabrizio Ulivieri - TrendSetter

Questo è un capitoletto del mio nuovo libro in fase di scrittura "A New Normal". Che si svolge a Vilnius, in Lituania. E' LEGGIBILE LA PRIMA PARTE IN ACADEMIA La notizia rimbalzava su tutti i media, TV, giornali, radio, internet…da una parte all’altra del mondo. Il parlamento italiano, la sua sede, Montecitorio, era stato avvolta da fiamme altissime, violente, mai visto niente di simile, sembrava l’Apocalisse, che in pochissimo tempo avevano divorato l’enorme palazzo. Il tetto era rapidamente crollato e seppellito tutti i parlamentari in seduta plenaria intrappolati. Un’ecatombe. Si narrava che solo una decina di persone si fossero salvate. Testimoni oculari che si trovavano all’esterno, nella piazza antistante il palazzo, giuravano di aver visto piovere dal cielo palle di fuoco improvvise. Le autorità non potevano né confermare né smentire queste testimonianze. Anche loro però ribadivano l’eccezionalità dell’evento. E la cosa più strana di tutte era che il fuoco era rim...

  When the media denigrates someone they do that independently of the truth. The approximation is truth, slanders are truth, because they are begotten in view of a loftier good, the health of human society (but in reality they don't care a damn). Thence arose the most practical conclusion: that it is useless to seek absolute evidence - for evidence is always relative - dogmas don’t need relativity and therefore don’t need evidence - for evidence can always be interpreted and it may differ in the act of interpreting. In other words, the media can state different things at different times. As a result, the proofs of their slander can be relative, approximate, without no evidence and no witness, without even searching for them. The journalist and the media authority, their status, their position within the Global and One-Way Thinking, validate per ipsa their statements basing his conclusions not only on his own intellect but also on his “party” sensitivity, his moral forces" (in...

"They won't stop. Why won't they stop? It's not the old hegemonies (but it's always the old pursuit of hegemony.) People have to deal with elites who have no empathy ... they are inhuman, this is the point: peoples are dealing with inhuman elites, that's the point!"(Glauco Benigni, journalist and writer) "The entire information system is now into the hands of the enemy ... the enemy operates through the media"(Giulietto Chiesa, journalist) Without this vision, this line of reality, that starts from Babylon and before Babylon (450,000 years ago when the Anunnaki are said to have arrived) many things will miss the point and will remain incomprehensible. Obscure. Without this line of reality, it is impossible to understand the hatred between financial elites and populace. We won't comprehend the real meaning (and necessity) of secrets societies (masonry, above all), of religions - of the never ceasing fight between gnosis (masonry, p...

Photo Živilė Abrutytė The process of domestication was/is accellerated by external actors. The external actors were/are military e/o financial elites, who rule(d) the mankind since its inception to the present day. These elites may not be human. The process domestication could imply the rewriting of the entire history of Mankind. What is called "narrative" is in fact domestication. Basically History is narrative, therefore the History of Mankind is the history of Domestication. Manipulation and domestication have the same nature. Manipulation is accelaration and preservation (by maintenance) of domestication. Domestication is constantly maintained. Media are expression of this maintenance. Existentialist philosophy does not investigate the meaning of life, but investigates human nature that rebels against domestication and seeks its neotenic freedom, the nature before the inception.