Fabrizio Ulivieri - TrendSetter

Secondo Sant' Agostino mentire è innanzitutto, un‘intenzione dell‘animo e non dipende dalla cosa in sé. Ex animi enim sui sententia, non ex rerum ipsarum veritate vel falsitate mentiens aut non mentiens iudicandus est [1] Le osservazioni di Agostino sono valide perché sono fatte in riferimento alla coscienza, ovvero a ciò che enuncia ciò che è male o bene. Ma che succede quando questo punto di riferimento si annulla e la coscienza come tale, in sé e per sé, viene a mancare, perché vengono a mancare, sono evaporati, i valori di riferimento che segnalano ciò che è  bene o male? Questa situazione si attua quando chi mente, vivendo in un ambiente, in una società in cui la menzogna è il fondamento stesso di quella società, entra a far parte di quel sistema costante e reiterato in maniera parossistica di menzogna per cui chi mente mente in modo così costante esasperato ed estremo che alla fine non sa nemmeno più di mentire [2], e viene a mancare il fondamento stesso dell‘affermazione d...

According to St. Augustine, lying is above all an intention of the soul and does not depend on the thing-in-itself.  Ex animi enim sui sententia, non ex rerum ipsarum veritate vel falsitate mentiens aut non mentiens iudicandus est [1] Augustine's observations are valid because they are made with reference to conscience, that is, to what enunciates an indication in order to distinguish what is good and what is bad. But what is going to happens when this medium of reference vanishes and consciousness as such, in-itself, is missing, because the reference values that signal what is good or bad are vanished, evaporated? The very tenet of Augustine that in order to lie there must be the intention to lie has become invalid. Because whoever lies, living in an environment, in a society in which lying is the very foundation of that society, becomes part of that constant and paroxysmal reiterated system of lies yo such extent that he lies in a so constant exasperated and extreme way tha...

  These brief notes are sketched after reading Alvydas Jokubaitis book "The Political Idiot". The concept of the Dostoevsky underground man is a very relevant concept because highlights a rebellious man. And today we see how globalist forces have actually tried and are trying to push rebellious humanity into the underground. In fact, the rebellious man had no choice but to retreat to the underground to defend his values ​​in recent years. As Jokubaitys argues: "The term  underground man is a description of a person who has deliberately withdrawn from society and he opposes society. The underground man criticizes the efforts of modern politicians and political theorists to create a science-based society" (A. Jokubaitys Political Idiot. P. 64) ... "because he does not accept that who leads the society make him happy according to their conception of happiness." (Ibid. P. 65). The underground man defends his inalienable right to truth, freedom, and happiness b...