Fabrizio Ulivieri - TrendSetter

  When the media denigrates someone they do that independently of the truth. The approximation is truth, slanders are truth, because they are begotten in view of a loftier good, the health of human society (but in reality they don't care a damn). Thence arose the most practical conclusion: that it is useless to seek absolute evidence - for evidence is always relative - dogmas don’t need relativity and therefore don’t need evidence - for evidence can always be interpreted and it may differ in the act of interpreting. In other words, the media can state different things at different times. As a result, the proofs of their slander can be relative, approximate, without no evidence and no witness, without even searching for them. The journalist and the media authority, their status, their position within the Global and One-Way Thinking, validate per ipsa their statements basing his conclusions not only on his own intellect but also on his “party” sensitivity, his moral forces" (in...

Ad te clamamus exsules filii Evæ Ad te suspiramus gementes et flentes in hac lacrimarum valle If you stay mourning and weeping in this valley of tears you can’t see clearly, you can’t make out the other reality through the curtains of this reality. If I have faith - he asked himself - where did it come from? It births from the sufferance, from the impossibility of making out through this smokescreen. Et opera sua sine strepitu intus enarrat . And the more I love God the less I love humanity. And Christ and his Mother are replenishing the faith by showing a great many works they stay behind. When he heard that the Chancellor of Germany apologizing in front of her folk and declaring she has changed mind, his heart hopped. It had never happened such a situation. But he knew why. She had appeared haunted during the press conference. Tense. The tension, the conflict are the sign of the hand of God. Dostoevsky teaches it to us, he has shown it so clearly in his works, unmistakably the sign...

Non dà l'un porco a l'altro porco doglia, l'un cervo a l'altro; solamente l'uomo l'altro uom amazza, crocifigge e spoglia (Machiavelli, L'Asino) One day of my life not far from the year that changed the world throwing it in a complete folly I probably had a premonition. A crazy idea surged ahead of my mind, to link Dostoevsky to David Icke. Was it possible? I wanted to connect the ruthless search for the inner madness of man to the madness of human existence lived inside a hetero-directed society lead by occult forces. Was it possible? as Camus says Dostoevsky 's characters do not fear the ridiculous [1] and cruelly question themselves and live in a madness that leads them to social ridicule. Didn't David Icke benefit of the social ridicule from a society directed by invisible powers because of his way of living and thinking? I didn’ t know if The Anunnaki were Reptilians, as Icke maintained, or not. I knew that there was a gap, a fracture be...