Skip to main content

Apie nereliatyvizuojamus fundamentalius filosofinius klausimus

 









Kai vertini istoriškai, tu reliatyvizuoji. Tuo pačiu metu, kai įtrauki į kontekstą esminius filosofinius klausimus, atimi iš jų filosofinę vertę ir reliatyvizuoji jų reikšmę. Tas pats ir su tiesa: jos negalima reliatyvizuoti. Tiesa yra viena. Lygiai taip pat ir esminiai filosofiniai klausimai — jie nepriklauso nei nuo laiko, nei nuo vietos.[1] Tokiu principiniu klausimu prasideda ir Mundaka Upanišada.

कस्मिन्नु भगवो विज्ञाते सर्वमिदं विज्ञातं भवतीति
kasmin nu bhagavo vijñāte sarvam idaṃ vijñātaṃ bhavatīti
„O Garbingasis Viešpatie, ar pažinus tai (hic et nunc), tampa pažinta visa tai, kas yra (idam)?“

Kitaip tariant, jei žinau tai (hic et nunc), žinosiu ir visa kita. Jei atsiras tai (hic et nunc), atsiras ir visa kita.

Antano Maceinos mintyje ši esminė pažinimo klausimo struktūra buvo susieta su skausmu. Maceina atrado skausmą kaip pagrindinę žmogaus egzistencijos varomąją jėgą.

Maceina labai anksti susidūrė su pasaulyje šėlstančiu blogiu: „Man pačiam blogis įvairiu savo pavidalu (skurdas, nelaimė, pikta valia) buvo artimas nuo pat ankstyvos jaunystės (mirus motinai, augau Prienuose pas tetą), tad ir mano galvojimas labiausiai buvo apspręstas kančios.“[2]

Paėmėme Antano Maceinos pavyzdį, nes jis yra filosofas, kuriam skausmas, kaip stiprus Lietuvos minties ir visuomenės komponentas, buvo itin svarbus jo filosofinės minties raidai.

-----------------------

[1] Geriausias pavyzdys šiuo atžvilgiu yra Machiavellio veikalas Valdovas, kuriame nagrinėjami esminiai klausimai, susiję su princo valdžios struktūra, ir kurie išlieka aktualūs tiek anuomet, tiek dabar.
[2] „Per filosofą prasiveržia dvasinis nerimas“, Švyturys, 1989, Nr. 20, p. 22.

-------------------

Telegram: De Unamuno
Whatsapp: De Unamuno







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

Yellow moons

Yellow moons at nighttime, Beyond the windows loom Stretch along and rise to bloom Flooding streets and singing rhyme. Downtown trains are full tonight. White pale girls try hard  Their world shy discard  Cross pale and dull the light. Like crows wave hands  Uneasy scatter and chat around Watch the light now profound. But proudly keep their stands. Nothing captures their heart. Like thorns they are - without a rose. Oh, if I were the one they choose I would span silent the dark. I know that window, I know it's late I know the stairs and the doorway I stand by the light at the four-way I walk down past the gate and wait. Will I see her eyes tonight? From a downtown train A girl among many faces, insane Will I catch her slight dim sight? Oh my dreams, if she falls away, Am I going alone nowhere? Following the moon's glare I lonely wait - watch the train stay. -------------- PS. " Downtown Train" is one of my favourite songs. Tom Waits’ voice, or Rod Stewart’s voice sing...

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we have proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Epistle to the Romans 1:19: τ ὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν — “that which may be known of God has been made manifest in them (in men), for God has manifested it unto them”. Poetry unveils within the human being the need to be human, that is, the need for Beauty, the need to feel Beauty within oneself and alongside oneself; and this feeling is sustained by divine light. Since we are influenced by the Augustinian idea of saeculum , we hold that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore comes to a halt upon the threshold of divine light [I] without crossing it, though perceiving the light that lies beyond that threshold. We are led to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty that dwells within us and guides us to that point: to that door which cannot be crossed in our human condition. And yet, the mere act of stan...