Skip to main content

On Structures and Who Creates Them (or 'Philosophical Neutrality Doesn’t Exist')

 



In philosophy, I have been insisting on this point for several months: there is a deeply ingrained belief that philosophy and philosophers are the true creators of thought. However, this is not entirely accurate. Philosophers create structures of thinking and opinions that hinge on those structures, but they are not the creators of the reality that moved them to think in alignment with those structures.

Behind them lies a power—often hidden, concealed, or even supernatural—that pushes toward certain drifts by using financial and military forces to support this central power, never unhinged from spiritual and supernatural visions, which align themselves with geopolitical plans and strategies of domination.

The best examples of this are Nihilism and nihilist thinkers of the calibre of Nietzsche and Heidegger, just to name a couple.

Ultimately, this is the framework within which every thinker lives and elaborates their ideas.

Philosophy is never immune to external influences, contrary to what we are accustomed (or pleased) to think. It is less risky and easier to commit reasoning to established structures because thinkers—or labourers of thought, such as university professors of philosophy—operate within the same structures (universities, foundations, publishers, media outlets...) created ad hoc by the power I mentioned above.

Philosophers and labourers of thought live on the bread bestowed by that power or, in some cases, are even actively involved in its workings. 
When we analyze the thought of a philosopher, we must never lose sight of this perspective. If we move from this perspective, we can better understand how nihilism, for example, was the most powerful weapon developed over the centuries to destroy Christianity.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we have proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Epistle to the Romans 1:19: τ ὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν — “that which may be known of God has been made manifest in them (in men), for God has manifested it unto them”. Poetry unveils within the human being the need to be human, that is, the need for Beauty, the need to feel Beauty within oneself and alongside oneself; and this feeling is sustained by divine light. Since we are influenced by the Augustinian idea of saeculum , we hold that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore comes to a halt upon the threshold of divine light [I] without crossing it, though perceiving the light that lies beyond that threshold. We are led to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty that dwells within us and guides us to that point: to that door which cannot be crossed in our human condition. And yet, the mere act of stan...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

L'ombra del dharma

  Può qualcuno nascondere la verità per tutta la sua vita  e ingannare sé e tutti gli altri?  Vi sono demoni nell'uomo, che vengono di lontano  - per linee di sangue e generazioni che,  se li ascolti, si fanno tuo dharma Se cerco di spiegare quello che eri Devo l' oltre e il prima guardare Dove cause ignote e foschi criteri Erano il karma del tuo andare. Di lí andavi larvato di nulla E mai il volto sincero mostravi. Di silenzio vivevi in una bolla Eppure libero a me sembravi. In pubblico e privato ti scindevi E disprezzavi me a te non pari Ma santo mi apparivi e tu sapevi. Del tuo dharma che adesso appari Eri schiavo - di quel lontano demone Tara remota e senza memoria Che nel sangue ti seguiva epigone E segnava immemore tua la storia.