Does the good or bad fortune of the living affect the happiness or misery of the dead?

I have always maintained that the deceased live within us and that those deceased who, during their lives, came into contact with us exert a stronger influence on our lives, depending on the duration of that contact.
However, now I want to pose an opposite question: How can our current experiences, those fortunes or misfortunes that happen to us daily, influence the impact on dead people?

In other words:

Does the good or bad fortune of the living affect the happiness or misery of the dead?

It is certainly difficult to find an answer because, first and foremost, one must identify the most suitable field of inquiry to guarantee a response.

To obtain an answer, I must ensure a field of investigation that can provide answers.

For example, the realm of visions.

One example in this regard comes from Natuzza Evolo.

One day, a deceased mother appeared to Natuzza, asking her to reassure her daughter, who was suffering greatly from her loss. Natuzza conveyed the message to the daughter, offering comfort and peace to the grieving family.

Other examples can be drawn from Anna Katharina Emmerick.

Anna Katharina Emmerick recounts seeing the soul of a mother in Purgatory, who was suffering not only for her own purification but also for the difficulties her daughter was experiencing on Earth. The mother was concerned because her daughter was facing severe economic and spiritual problems. She asked Anna Katharina to pray for the daughter and to offer her spiritual support. This episode underscores the emotional and spiritual bond between the deceased and their living loved ones.

Anna Katharina Emmerick also described visions in which parents' souls sought forgiveness and intercession for their children. One soul, in particular, appeared to Anna Katharina, asking her to pray that her children be freed from the consequences of her sins. The soul was tormented by the thought that her mistakes had caused misfortune and hardship for her children still living.

One of the most notable episodes involves Padre Pio seeing the soul of a deceased monk who was suffering in Purgatory. The monk appeared to Padre Pio in the confessional. He revealed that he was a monk who had died in the monastery but had not completed his penance. He was suffering in Purgatory and was deeply concerned about his family struggling on Earth due to his past actions.

The deceased monk asked Padre Pio to offer prayers and Masses for him, so he could be relieved from Purgatory and, in turn, help his family find peace and resolution to their difficulties. Padre Pio agreed and devoted time to praying and offering Masses for the monk's soul. After a period of these dedicated prayers and Masses, the monk appeared to Padre Pio again, this time expressing gratitude as he was finally freed from Purgatory. The monk's release from suffering was believed to bring spiritual comfort and blessings to his family on Earth, alleviating their hardships.

Thus, yes, the good or bad fortune of the living does affect the happiness or misery of the dead.
And this contradicts what St. Augustine claims: Mortuorum animae non intersunt rebus viventium, The souls of the dead do not know what happens in the realm of the living.

-----------------------
[1] DE CURA PRO MORTUIS GERENDA LIBER UNUS, 13,15

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

My world before and after the so-called Pandemic

Prior to the so-called pandemic, the world was different. I was different. One of my greatest moments of pleasure was visiting unknown cities, lost in the unknown, following an unknown flux of life surrounded by unknown streets and people. I felt invisible. No one knew me, and I knew no one. That gave me a strong sense of pleasure. The pleasure of doing things you usually avoid in places where everyday life, routine, and the fear of showing yourself in a way people are not accustomed to expecting from you. I am not sure what I was looking for in doing this. I remember I felt pushed to search for the essence of that world, as I could physically taste that essence. I was looking for an aura of mystery which could rescue me from my nothingness (I called it nothingness, but now I should call it stupidity—because now I realize what an idiot I was). I hoped for goodness from the world, I hoped for a magic of life, I hoped for an encounter which would be my Saviour, the Savi...

Fabrizio Ulivieri - Content Creator

Search This Blog