Skip to main content

King Lear is a madman whose mad energy imbues his daughters with his madness and deforms his kingdom






τὰ μὲν γὰρ ὕλης κεχωρισμένα καὶ σωμάτων ἐνεργείαις ἦν τὰ αὐτά, τὰ δὲ ὕλῃ πλησιάζοντα καὶ σώμασιν αὐτὰ μὲν ἀπαθῆ, τὰ δὲ ἐφ᾽ ὧν θεωρεῖται, πάσχει
"Those realities separated from matter and bodies are in fact always the same in themselves; those things which approximate to matter and bodies, are themselves, still, impassive; but where they manifest themselves, suffering manifests itself" (Porfirius Sententiae)


King Lear is a victim of himself, of his insanity.
When he asks himself "Who is it that can tell me who I am?" the fool adequately responds: "Lear's shadow".
The moment he gave up his King's role for a suppos'd quieter life he denied his identity and became the shadow of himself. A king is a king forever, if you try to deny it you deny your person. Every person who denies his identity becomes a shadow of himself.
Of course, Goneril is cruel, disloyal, and scheming...but her contempt towards her father is unavoidably born from the violent proximity to an act of a madman who commits the madness of denying his own identity by his asking her to flatter him with a prìonunciation of her love for him which is contrary to her nature.
This is an act of folly which is transmitted from the father to her daughter (proximity).
Like Macbeth who has his Folly generated by his proximity to the death he witnessed and took part in during the battle against the Norwegians.
And his wickedness, as well, is brought to light from the proximity and propinquity to the witches who put an immaterial woodworm in his heart and soul.
And this folly entered, by proximity and propinquity, from the immaterial into the material world where everyone has rapidly become a shadow of him-/her-self.

--------------------

"Blasts and fogs upon thee!
  Th' untented woundings of a father's curse
  Pierce every sense about thee!—"

These are the words of Lear to his daughter Goneril. Words of a curse: energy of the immaterial which is intentioned into the material by proximity and intentionality.

--------------------

Goneril with a letter will convey her hatred for his father to his sister, she will convey her malicious and hateful intention through a letter. That same hatred that Lear himself unblocked from the beginning will be the daemon that will keep the play alive and finds in Goneril its multiplier center.

  Gon.
  How now, Oswald!
  What, have you writ that letter to my sister?

  Osw.
  Ay, madam.

  Gon.
  Take you some company, and away to horse:
  Inform her full of my particular fear;
  And thereto add such reasons of your own
  As may compact it more.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

My world before and after the so-called Pandemic

  Prior to the so-called pandemic, the world was different. I was different.  One of my greatest moments of pleasure was visiting unknown cities, lost in the unknown, following an unknown flux of life surrounded by unknown streets and people.  I felt invisible. No one knew me, and I knew no one. That gave me a strong sense of pleasure. The pleasure of doing things you usually avoid in places where everyday life, routine, and the fear of showing yourself in a way people are not accustomed to expecting from you. I am not sure what I was looking for in doing this. I remember I felt pushed to search for the essence of that world, as I could physically taste that essence. I was looking for an aura of mystery which could rescue me from my nothingness (I called it nothingness, but now I should call it stupidity—because now I realize what an idiot I was). I hoped for goodness from the world, I hoped for a magic of life, I hoped for an encounter which would be my Saviour, the Savi...