Skip to main content

An unexpected attraction - Sturgeon's Law (fourth part)





His most recent book, Why should I read books if the 99% is shit? had become to his surprise an enormous success. Some Lithuanian publishers that in the past never considered his works started inviting him to lecture to Vilniaus Universitetas students of Literature and to some book presentations in the city.
During these lectures, he was many times asked why he thought that 90% of published books were crap.
In his support, he mentioned Sturgeon's law.
Many of the people he lectured didn't know anything of Sturgeon’s law. So he had to recap it for them. Sturgeon's law is an adage - he used to start - that states that 90% of everything is crap. It was coined by Theodore Sturgeon, an American science fiction author and critic, who was tired of defending his genre from critics who used the worst examples of science fiction as ammunition against him. He realized that most works in other fields were also low-quality, and so science fiction was no different.
He first expressed his law around 1951 at a talk at New York University, and later wrote it in his book review column for Venture magazine in 1957. He also called it Sturgeon’s Revelation, and added some corollaries to explain his point of view.
After repeating this refrain there was always someone who objected that it was a very subjective opinion that 90% of published books are crud.
To these people he objected it's not subjective but it's reality. And whoever thinks it's subjective is because it's part of the 90%. But according to him, 90% was little, but 99% was reality. Whereupon many got up and left.
And obviously, this boutade of his did not please the Lithuanian publishing houses who boycotted him and never invited him again.

TO BE CONTINUED (MAYBE)...





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

Yellow moons

Yellow moons at nighttime, Beyond the windows loom Stretch along and rise to bloom Flooding streets and singing rhyme. Downtown trains are full tonight. White pale girls try hard  Their world shy discard  Cross pale and dull the light. Like crows wave hands  Uneasy scatter and chat around Watch the light now profound. But proudly keep their stands. Nothing captures their heart. Like thorns they are - without a rose. Oh, if I were the one they choose I would span silent the dark. I know that window, I know it's late I know the stairs and the doorway I stand by the light at the four-way I walk down past the gate and wait. Will I see her eyes tonight? From a downtown train A girl among many faces, insane Will I catch her slight dim sight? Oh my dreams, if she falls away, Am I going alone nowhere? Following the moon's glare I lonely wait - watch the train stay. -------------- PS. " Downtown Train" is one of my favourite songs. Tom Waits’ voice, or Rod Stewart’s voice sing...

Lietuviško skausmo kultūra

  Gyvenu Lietuvoje jau keletą metų. Vertinu daug dalykų Lietuvoje. Ypač įdomūs man pasirodė žmonės. Mano nuomone, tai žmonės - ypač kilę iš kaimo vietovių, kurie sudaro daugumą - giliai įsišakniję skausmo kultūroje. Čia dalinuosi savo pastebėjimais, kurie gali būti neteisingi. Jei mano pastebėjimai neteisingi, prašau juos laikyti išoriniais — užsieniečio iš kitos kultūros žvilgsnio pastebėjimais Pagarba kitam paprastai matuojama laisve : „Kiek toli galiu peržengti savo laisvę, netapdamas problema kitam?“  Lietuvoje šis matas tampa kitu klausimu: „Kiek toli galiu peržengti savo skausmo slenkstį, kad mano skausmas netaptų problema kitam?“ Lietuviška kultūra yra giliai panirusi į skausmo viziją. Taip nutiko dėl daugelio priežasčių, tačiau svarbiausia, mano akimis, yra viena: lietuvis žmogus yra užsidaręs savyje - izoliuota, uždara ir beveik neįveikiama monada. Lietuvis žmogus turi savo tapatybę, bet ją visada sieja su dominuojančia viešąja mintimi. Jis eina savo keliu, bet visada...