Skip to main content

An unexpected attraction - Sturgeon's Law (fourth part)





His most recent book, Why should I read books if the 99% is shit? had become to his surprise an enormous success. Some Lithuanian publishers that in the past never considered his works started inviting him to lecture to Vilniaus Universitetas students of Literature and to some book presentations in the city.
During these lectures, he was many times asked why he thought that 90% of published books were crap.
In his support, he mentioned Sturgeon's law.
Many of the people he lectured didn't know anything of Sturgeon’s law. So he had to recap it for them. Sturgeon's law is an adage - he used to start - that states that 90% of everything is crap. It was coined by Theodore Sturgeon, an American science fiction author and critic, who was tired of defending his genre from critics who used the worst examples of science fiction as ammunition against him. He realized that most works in other fields were also low-quality, and so science fiction was no different.
He first expressed his law around 1951 at a talk at New York University, and later wrote it in his book review column for Venture magazine in 1957. He also called it Sturgeon’s Revelation, and added some corollaries to explain his point of view.
After repeating this refrain there was always someone who objected that it was a very subjective opinion that 90% of published books are crud.
To these people he objected it's not subjective but it's reality. And whoever thinks it's subjective is because it's part of the 90%. But according to him, 90% was little, but 99% was reality. Whereupon many got up and left.
And obviously, this boutade of his did not please the Lithuanian publishing houses who boycotted him and never invited him again.

TO BE CONTINUED (MAYBE)...





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we have proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Epistle to the Romans 1:19: τ ὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν — “that which may be known of God has been made manifest in them (in men), for God has manifested it unto them”. Poetry unveils within the human being the need to be human, that is, the need for Beauty, the need to feel Beauty within oneself and alongside oneself; and this feeling is sustained by divine light. Since we are influenced by the Augustinian idea of saeculum , we hold that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore comes to a halt upon the threshold of divine light [I] without crossing it, though perceiving the light that lies beyond that threshold. We are led to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty that dwells within us and guides us to that point: to that door which cannot be crossed in our human condition. And yet, the mere act of stan...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

L'ombra del dharma

  Può qualcuno nascondere la verità per tutta la sua vita  e ingannare sé e tutti gli altri?  Vi sono demoni nell'uomo, che vengono di lontano  - per linee di sangue e generazioni che,  se li ascolti, si fanno tuo dharma Se cerco di spiegare quello che eri Devo l' oltre e il prima guardare Dove cause ignote e foschi criteri Erano il karma del tuo andare. Di lí andavi larvato di nulla E mai il volto sincero mostravi. Di silenzio vivevi in una bolla Eppure libero a me sembravi. In pubblico e privato ti scindevi E disprezzavi me a te non pari Ma santo mi apparivi e tu sapevi. Del tuo dharma che adesso appari Eri schiavo - di quel lontano demone Tara remota e senza memoria Che nel sangue ti seguiva epigone E segnava immemore tua la storia.