Skip to main content

Humanity has been created for eternal beauty but the majority has forgotten it or never knew it





Leopardi was able to (fore-)see how in the "progress" of poetry a human distortion was hidden, in the sense of a detachment from the sacred bond that unites man to natural life, i.e. to creation. And this distortion was clearly seen in romantic poetry, which was a further step, such as Humanism and the French Revolution, for example, which led humanity over the centuries to detach itself from what is its role, of being created in the image of creation, and therefore of its Creator. And today we see the outcome: the immense devastation caused by the tenets of globalism.

The civilization that romantic poets sang has led to love the "vezzi terreni" (the earthly ones of the translation beneath) and to despise the eternal works instead so that the eternal values have decayed to such an extent that they became mere polytheistic adoration of money, earthly wealth, eternal human youth, etc... And humanity has now established itself as a candidate for immortality through AI, finally embodying the role of surrogate creator of a new world where are no longer recognized the "works of God" and the "beauties universal and perpetual"

Because, finally, one of the principal differences between the Romantic poets and ours, within which difference are contained an infinite number of others, is the following: that ours generally sing nature in the best way they can, and the Romantics, instead, sing civilization in the best way they can; ours, eternal and immutable matters and forms and beauties, and theirs, the transitory and the mutable ones; ours, the works of God, and theirs, the works of man... Thus it is clearer than the light of day that our poets look in every way for the primitive, even when they speak of modern things, and the Romantics, by contrast, look in every way for modernity, even when they speak of things ancient and primitive... What say you to this, o Readers? Is this not an admirable exchange? Do you not see that they are tired of nature’s celestial manners and seek earthly ones? Do you not see that those delights that they no longer find – or claim not to find – in the works of God and in beauties universal and perpetual, and that they dismiss as old-fashioned, they must then beg from the particulars, the ephemera, from fashions and from things made by men? [1]

[1] GIACOMO LEOPARDI, DISCOURSE OF AN ITALIAN ON ROMANTIC POETRY 87-91 passim
Translated by Gabrielle Sims and Fabio A. Camilletti

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we have proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Epistle to the Romans 1:19: τ ὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν — “that which may be known of God has been made manifest in them (in men), for God has manifested it unto them”. Poetry unveils within the human being the need to be human, that is, the need for Beauty, the need to feel Beauty within oneself and alongside oneself; and this feeling is sustained by divine light. Since we are influenced by the Augustinian idea of saeculum , we hold that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore comes to a halt upon the threshold of divine light [I] without crossing it, though perceiving the light that lies beyond that threshold. We are led to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty that dwells within us and guides us to that point: to that door which cannot be crossed in our human condition. And yet, the mere act of stan...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

L'ombra del dharma

  Può qualcuno nascondere la verità per tutta la sua vita  e ingannare sé e tutti gli altri?  Vi sono demoni nell'uomo, che vengono di lontano  - per linee di sangue e generazioni che,  se li ascolti, si fanno tuo dharma Se cerco di spiegare quello che eri Devo l' oltre e il prima guardare Dove cause ignote e foschi criteri Erano il karma del tuo andare. Di lí andavi larvato di nulla E mai il volto sincero mostravi. Di silenzio vivevi in una bolla Eppure libero a me sembravi. In pubblico e privato ti scindevi E disprezzavi me a te non pari Ma santo mi apparivi e tu sapevi. Del tuo dharma che adesso appari Eri schiavo - di quel lontano demone Tara remota e senza memoria Che nel sangue ti seguiva epigone E segnava immemore tua la storia.