Skip to main content

Humanity has been created for eternal beauty but the majority has forgotten it or never knew it





Leopardi was able to (fore-)see how in the "progress" of poetry a human distortion was hidden, in the sense of a detachment from the sacred bond that unites man to natural life, i.e. to creation. And this distortion was clearly seen in romantic poetry, which was a further step, such as Humanism and the French Revolution, for example, which led humanity over the centuries to detach itself from what is its role, of being created in the image of creation, and therefore of its Creator. And today we see the outcome: the immense devastation caused by the tenets of globalism.

The civilization that romantic poets sang has led to love the "vezzi terreni" (the earthly ones of the translation beneath) and to despise the eternal works instead so that the eternal values have decayed to such an extent that they became mere polytheistic adoration of money, earthly wealth, eternal human youth, etc... And humanity has now established itself as a candidate for immortality through AI, finally embodying the role of surrogate creator of a new world where are no longer recognized the "works of God" and the "beauties universal and perpetual"

Because, finally, one of the principal differences between the Romantic poets and ours, within which difference are contained an infinite number of others, is the following: that ours generally sing nature in the best way they can, and the Romantics, instead, sing civilization in the best way they can; ours, eternal and immutable matters and forms and beauties, and theirs, the transitory and the mutable ones; ours, the works of God, and theirs, the works of man... Thus it is clearer than the light of day that our poets look in every way for the primitive, even when they speak of modern things, and the Romantics, by contrast, look in every way for modernity, even when they speak of things ancient and primitive... What say you to this, o Readers? Is this not an admirable exchange? Do you not see that they are tired of nature’s celestial manners and seek earthly ones? Do you not see that those delights that they no longer find – or claim not to find – in the works of God and in beauties universal and perpetual, and that they dismiss as old-fashioned, they must then beg from the particulars, the ephemera, from fashions and from things made by men? [1]

[1] GIACOMO LEOPARDI, DISCOURSE OF AN ITALIAN ON ROMANTIC POETRY 87-91 passim
Translated by Gabrielle Sims and Fabio A. Camilletti

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

Yellow moons

Yellow moons at nighttime, Beyond the windows loom Stretch along and rise to bloom Flooding streets and singing rhyme. Downtown trains are full tonight. White pale girls try hard  Their world shy discard  Cross pale and dull the light. Like crows wave hands  Uneasy scatter and chat around Watch the light now profound. But proudly keep their stands. Nothing captures their heart. Like thorns they are - without a rose. Oh, if I were the one they choose I would span silent the dark. I know that window, I know it's late I know the stairs and the doorway I stand by the light at the four-way I walk down past the gate and wait. Will I see her eyes tonight? From a downtown train A girl among many faces, insane Will I catch her slight dim sight? Oh my dreams, if she falls away, Am I going alone nowhere? Following the moon's glare I lonely wait - watch the train stay. -------------- PS. " Downtown Train" is one of my favourite songs. Tom Waits’ voice, or Rod Stewart’s voice sing...

Lietuviško skausmo kultūra

  Gyvenu Lietuvoje jau keletą metų. Vertinu daug dalykų Lietuvoje. Ypač įdomūs man pasirodė žmonės. Mano nuomone, tai žmonės - ypač kilę iš kaimo vietovių, kurie sudaro daugumą - giliai įsišakniję skausmo kultūroje. Čia dalinuosi savo pastebėjimais, kurie gali būti neteisingi. Jei mano pastebėjimai neteisingi, prašau juos laikyti išoriniais — užsieniečio iš kitos kultūros žvilgsnio pastebėjimais Pagarba kitam paprastai matuojama laisve : „Kiek toli galiu peržengti savo laisvę, netapdamas problema kitam?“  Lietuvoje šis matas tampa kitu klausimu: „Kiek toli galiu peržengti savo skausmo slenkstį, kad mano skausmas netaptų problema kitam?“ Lietuviška kultūra yra giliai panirusi į skausmo viziją. Taip nutiko dėl daugelio priežasčių, tačiau svarbiausia, mano akimis, yra viena: lietuvis žmogus yra užsidaręs savyje - izoliuota, uždara ir beveik neįveikiama monada. Lietuvis žmogus turi savo tapatybę, bet ją visada sieja su dominuojančia viešąja mintimi. Jis eina savo keliu, bet visada...