Skip to main content

Machiavellism, transformism and Togliatti



Renato Mieli, in Togliatti 1937, captures well the synthesis between Machiavellism and transformism, which in the post-war period from 1945 onwards was mainly introduced in Italy by the PCI.
"The Italian Communist leaders [who were in Russia during the Stalinist purges] possessed a particular quality that made them less vulnerable than others: political ductility. By instinct, perhaps more than by calculation of prudence, they knew how to adapt themselves promptly and with discretion to Stalinist politics, of which they shared the official line, ignoring what was contradictory and conflicting in practice. They dosed their consent so as not to provoke Stalin's diffidence, but to avoid, at the same time, making himself co-responsible for his policy in the most brutal aspects."

Such a a similar system experimented in Russia - the subtle art of adapting to the situation, being a lion and a fox of Machiavellian memory, avoiding the risks that a little less malleable position would entail - Togliatti reimplanted in the Italian culture when he arrives at Neaples.

On March 26, 1944, Italy's fate changes. It takes a more precise direction, which will produce its effects up to the present.
From the fishing boat "Pescara", Palmiro Togliatti disembarks in the port of Naples after twenty-five years away from Italy and from that day on, nothing will be the same. He came from the Soviet Union where he had been alongside Stalin. He had been one of Stalin's closest collaborators.
Vesuvius was erupting that day and the ashes and fire of the volcano were breathed in the air.
As those ashes had conquered the sky of Naples, Togliatti understands that he will have to conquer Italy in the same pervasive way with ideas and not with weapons. He would have applied the Gramsci’s theories of organic intellectual.
In fact, the first thing Togliatti did was to found the Review "Rinascita", which came out in July 1944. And in the first issue, Benedetto Croce the most important representative of liberal Italian culture was violently attacked. Also personally attacked.
With those attacks, Togliatti sent a message. He wanted to make the Italian communists understand who was the enemy to fight on a cultural and ideological level.
Another important message Togliatti sent to Italian intelligentsia on the day of the killing of Giovanni Gentile, claiming the killing of the philosopher. He defined the filosofo as a criminal, and claimed the killing as just and fruit of the will of the people. Gentile assassination warned all academics and intellectuals (Gentile unlike Croce had power in universities and publishing houses). The message was this: things have changed now; now we are in charge, but we can purify you, if you, fascist and gentiliani intellectuals, come over to our side, everything will be forgiven you and you will be redeemed. Intellectuals, a fearful and servile race, rushed en masse. We will transform you from fascist to organic intellectual. We will give you a new life and a new identity.

From these two events, Italian culture moves to the left. Fundamental in this shift is the "Partito d’azione" intermediate ideology. The basic idea of ​​the Partito d'azione was this: liberalism had to find more advanced balances, liberalism had to be anti-fascist but not anti-communist, and therefore attention and dialogue had to be opened with the communists, with the aim of bringing them on more democratic positions.
This organic-vision will determine the Italian political and cultural ideology from the post-war period onwards to the present day, according to the axiom that one can be anti-fascist but not anti-communist because being anti-communist means being fascist.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...

Yellow moons

Yellow moons at nighttime, Beyond the windows loom Stretch along and rise to bloom Flooding streets and singing rhyme. Downtown trains are full tonight. White pale girls try hard  Their world shy discard  Cross pale and dull the light. Like crows wave hands  Uneasy scatter and chat around Watch the light now profound. But proudly keep their stands. Nothing captures their heart. Like thorns they are - without a rose. Oh, if I were the one they choose I would span silent the dark. I know that window, I know it's late I know the stairs and the doorway I stand by the light at the four-way I walk down past the gate and wait. Will I see her eyes tonight? From a downtown train A girl among many faces, insane Will I catch her slight dim sight? Oh my dreams, if she falls away, Am I going alone nowhere? Following the moon's glare I lonely wait - watch the train stay. -------------- PS. " Downtown Train" is one of my favourite songs. Tom Waits’ voice, or Rod Stewart’s voice sing...

Lietuviško skausmo kultūra

  Gyvenu Lietuvoje jau keletą metų. Vertinu daug dalykų Lietuvoje. Ypač įdomūs man pasirodė žmonės. Mano nuomone, tai žmonės - ypač kilę iš kaimo vietovių, kurie sudaro daugumą - giliai įsišakniję skausmo kultūroje. Čia dalinuosi savo pastebėjimais, kurie gali būti neteisingi. Jei mano pastebėjimai neteisingi, prašau juos laikyti išoriniais — užsieniečio iš kitos kultūros žvilgsnio pastebėjimais Pagarba kitam paprastai matuojama laisve : „Kiek toli galiu peržengti savo laisvę, netapdamas problema kitam?“  Lietuvoje šis matas tampa kitu klausimu: „Kiek toli galiu peržengti savo skausmo slenkstį, kad mano skausmas netaptų problema kitam?“ Lietuviška kultūra yra giliai panirusi į skausmo viziją. Taip nutiko dėl daugelio priežasčių, tačiau svarbiausia, mano akimis, yra viena: lietuvis žmogus yra užsidaręs savyje - izoliuota, uždara ir beveik neįveikiama monada. Lietuvis žmogus turi savo tapatybę, bet ją visada sieja su dominuojančia viešąja mintimi. Jis eina savo keliu, bet visada...