Skip to main content

Meditación sobre la muerte





Hay solo una cosa que tiene sentido comprender en vida: la muerte, porque la muerte da pleno sentido a la historia del saeculum y, en consecuencia, a la narración de nuestras vidas.
Pensar en la muerte nos hace saborearla, saborearla antes de que suceda.
También debemos coexistir con quienes murieron, porque pueden vivir dentro de nosotros, así que podemos experimentar esas almas muertas en nuestra mente, huesos, piel y sangre.
Los muertos nos hablan, comen con nosotros, respiran con nosotros, duermen con nosotros. 
Son la microbiota de nuestra vida.
Aunque no podemos estar con quien muere en el momento de su fallecimiento, porque la muerte es soledad, podemos estar con ellos después de su muerte y con ellos hablar cada día.
Estos diálogos con ellos nos guían "hacia". El hombre tiene "el sentido del hacia" desde sus primeros días de existencia en el mundo, y el lugar donde se acabará el "hacia" es la muerte.
La muerte no se experimenta en la muerte del otro. La muerte del otro es simplemente una referencia, un eco del "hacia".
La muerte se experimenta en el diálogo con los muertos que nos comprometimos a mantener vivos en nuestra interioridad.

Este diálogo nos prepara para la muerte.
Esta posibilidad de instaurar un diálogo entre vivos y muertos nos insta a ver un elemento de continuidad entre vida y muerte.
Nadie puede negar que la vida pertenece a la muerte así como a la muerte pertenece la vida.
Ya esta proposición hace claro que entre vida y muerte hay un elemento de indiferencia que es continuativo (la continuidad).
Por esta razón, la muerte no es la extinción del ser humano, sino la continuación suya a lo largo de este elemento de indiferencia (continuidad) a las dos condiciones que permite la continuación del ser humano mismo en esta condición en sí misma; así que a través del elemento continuativo indiferente "color" el ojo puede pasar desde el verde al rojo.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fasting to reconnect your "Self" to your body

If there is a discrepancy between yourself and the body, between what you are and what you don't feel you are in your body, then fast, because there is excess to remove in the body. Through the stratifications of fat, the material that alienates you is deposited in the body. Removing decades of fat you remove the "Self" from its impediments to be reconnected with the body. Start thinking about fasting and wait for the right moment. Your body has its own indicators; it will signal when it is the right time to start fasting. Fasting is not a mere physical fact. It is changing the spirit of a time that has become stranger to us and that lives in us in order to alienate us to ourselves. Impossible to fast, without implying a change of the inner spirit. Those who fasted in the Old Testament did so to invoke great changes in life. Jesus himself fasted for forty nights and forty days and after fasting he was ready and strong enough to resist the devil and was ripe for his minist...

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...