In my opinion, Heidegger severely harmed thinking about Man.
He reduced Man to a mere structure, devoid of body and personal spirit.
In Heidegger, a man is a simple structure thrown into the world. But Man, first and foremost, is haecceitas.
I mean, He, She. It’s I, you, he, she, we, you, they... In Heidegger, Man becomes IT.
For this reason, Martin Heidegger’s philosophy is a significant distortion of the concept of Man.
His philosophical vision of Man is a post-romantic vision of contempt for Life. There cannot be Life in Man without Man. In Heidegger, there is no Man, but a structure of Man that he calls Dasein.
Probably, his Nazi vision influenced his thinking. In his view, Man is just a small brick in a vast wall.
In Heidegger, there is uniquely a culture of Death, not of Life.
His philosophical vision of Man is a post-romantic vision of contempt for Life. There cannot be Life in Man without Man. In Heidegger, there is no Man, but a structure of Man that he calls Dasein.
While romantic poets cherished the grave as a final rest from a life of disillusion and suffering, in Heidegger, the grave is the structure itself of humanity: Dasein.
Man, for Heidegger, is often merely a linguistic execution of linguistic games.
Man, for Heidegger, is often merely a linguistic execution of linguistic games.
Comments
Post a Comment