Skip to main content

Reflexiones sobre la condición humana del hombre: la Nada y el espíritu

 




No quiero decir que la Nada no existe; digo solamente que cuando se tienen valores, se reza o se escucha la palabra de Dios, no hay la Nada —ni alrededor, ni abajo, ni sobre, ni adelante, ni atrás de ti.
Se puede caer por un tiempo indefinido en la desesperación sin desmoronarse en la Nada. 
En la condición humana, que es algo más que existir como un animal, no hay la Nada; hay desesperación, la desesperación de vivir sin valores, sin futuro, sin… algo. 
Eso sí, pero no hay la Nada.

El hombre de Heidegger (Dasein) es un hombre deshumanizado, sin esperanza, reducido a la estructura de un existir sin humanidad (en mi opinión, el hombre de Heidegger representa el triunfo del nihilismo: un hombre sin interioridad, sin alma, sin espíritu que simplemente existe, estructuralmente).

¿Qué es el espíritu?
El espíritu del hombre es algo compuesto. Está formado por nuestro pre-ocuparnos de las cosas y de los seres humanos.
Nos relacionamos con las cosas a través de nuestro espíritu, que ya es un espíritu compuesto no solo de nuestra relación con las cosas, sino también de nuestra relación con las personas encontradas previamente. Somos un espíritu viviente compuesto por los espíritus vivientes con los que nos hemos intercambiado y relacionado antes, y según el eco de esos vínculos previos, nos acercamos a las cosas.
De esta manera, lo que es más privado se hace público, se dirige hacia (es de cara a) las cosas que están alrededor del hombre.
El espíritu tiene en sí la capacidad de escuchar la palabra de Dios, pero esta capacidad pertenece sobre todo al hombre interior. Y muchos hombres se niegan esa capacidad porque no la tienen: no poseen ninguna forma de gracia preventiva y ni siquiera están interesados en buscarla: εἰς ὃ ἐφθάσαμεν, τῷ αὐτῷ ⸀στοιχεῖν "conforme a lo que hemos llegado, marchemos en el mismo orden.” (Phil 3, 15-16)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fasting to reconnect your "Self" to your body

If there is a discrepancy between yourself and the body, between what you are and what you don't feel you are in your body, then fast, because there is excess to remove in the body. Through the stratifications of fat, the material that alienates you is deposited in the body. Removing decades of fat you remove the "Self" from its impediments to be reconnected with the body. Start thinking about fasting and wait for the right moment. Your body has its own indicators; it will signal when it is the right time to start fasting. Fasting is not a mere physical fact. It is changing the spirit of a time that has become stranger to us and that lives in us in order to alienate us to ourselves. Impossible to fast, without implying a change of the inner spirit. Those who fasted in the Old Testament did so to invoke great changes in life. Jesus himself fasted for forty nights and forty days and after fasting he was ready and strong enough to resist the devil and was ripe for his minist...

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...