Skip to main content

Dasein, Power, and Evil: A Critique of Philosophical Neutrality






What is often missing in philosophical discourse is the recognition that not all individuals (Dasein) exert the same level of influence on reality, particularly in terms of shaping or conditioning it.

Some individuals (Dasein) possess the power to condition the existence of others (Dasein) by imposing their ideologies, often forcefully. This imposition is carried out through geopolitical strategies that serve various interests, including:

1) Personal Power
2) Corporate Power
3) Financial Power


These three dimensions ultimately fall under a broader and more insidious agenda (A - Point):

"To introduce and propagate the power of Evil in the world"

Today, this ultimate aim has become increasingly evident in global events.

Philosophical analysts often generalize philosophical concepts as they are universally valid for all existences, but this assumption is flawed. Not every Dasein experiences or exercises the same influence, nor does philosophy operate from a neutral standpoint.

In fact, many philosophers—whether knowingly or unknowingly—have contributed to structuring what I called the "A-Point." For instance, thinkers such as Nietzsche, Hegel, Fichte, Feuerbach, and even Goethe have played significant roles in spreading ideas rooted in Masonry or Gnosticism. These ideologies have culminated in the current state of the world, where what can be described as a "Satanic sneer" has become definitely apparent.

Consider Heidegger and his ties to Nazism. His philosophy, focused on structures rather than individual human beings, casts humanity as entities subjected to an indifferent world, devoiding them of any inherent human value.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fasting to reconnect your "Self" to your body

If there is a discrepancy between yourself and the body, between what you are and what you don't feel you are in your body, then fast, because there is excess to remove in the body. Through the stratifications of fat, the material that alienates you is deposited in the body. Removing decades of fat you remove the "Self" from its impediments to be reconnected with the body. Start thinking about fasting and wait for the right moment. Your body has its own indicators; it will signal when it is the right time to start fasting. Fasting is not a mere physical fact. It is changing the spirit of a time that has become stranger to us and that lives in us in order to alienate us to ourselves. Impossible to fast, without implying a change of the inner spirit. Those who fasted in the Old Testament did so to invoke great changes in life. Jesus himself fasted for forty nights and forty days and after fasting he was ready and strong enough to resist the devil and was ripe for his minist...

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...