Skip to main content

The Masses Are Not Asking to Be Saved

 




There is much talk about "awakening" people, about the salvation of the masses, without considering a simple truth: the masses do not want to be saved. The mass is, by definition, something to be kneaded, shaped, and moulded—it exists to be acted upon.

The essence of the masses is formed from a single ingredient: complicity [1]. Complicity means accepting guilt without acknowledging it, acting not from personal conviction but simply following orders. It removes the sense of personal responsibility, for in complicity, one merely complies. But who asks for this compliance? Others. These "Others"—and perhaps "that" would be a more accurate term—are not individual humans in a moral or thoughtful sense but extensions of the collective mindless will. They are complicit but without awareness of their complicity.Complicity, in this sense, is participation in an endless chain of obedience, a chain without a visible end because the end is deliberately obscured. Every person complicit in this chain serves a hidden power that lies beyond the visible world. This hidden power manifests itself through the visible, and it has a name: Evil.
Evil is the absence of true creation. It does not make or form, but inspires others to do so, empowering them to mold and shape without genuine intent. It sets things in motion without taking direct action, using the masses as living, malleable material to be fashioned according to its hidden designs.
And those who claim to speak for the masses—those who insist that the masses are merely victims, hypnotized by the powers that be—are complicit in the same falsehood. By reinforcing this narrative, they help sustain the very structure they claim to oppose.
The masses are not the elites. They seek a life of comfort, of pleasure without suffering, a kind of utopia. They have no interest in politics, in enlightenment, or in salvation. Their goal is to live hic et nunc, here and now, without striving to distinguish themselves from animals

They prefer to silence the part of themselves that sets them apart from beasts—the part that, as Augustine says qua superat inferiores suas, quas etiam cum pecoribus communes habet [2],“surpasses the lower parts that are shared even with cattle.” Listening to that voice would bring suffering, and the masses seek, above all, to exclude suffering from their horizon.P.S. Regarding the minority who instead learn to listen to the transcendental and thereby transcend the mass, see above, number V.

PS.About the minority, who instead learns to listen to the transcendental hum and transcends the mass see my article in Academia

[1] For the concept of "complicity" see Giorgio Agamben Il complice e il sovrano
[2] Saint Augustine De Civitate Dei, XI, 2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fasting to reconnect your "Self" to your body

If there is a discrepancy between yourself and the body, between what you are and what you don't feel you are in your body, then fast, because there is excess to remove in the body. Through the stratifications of fat, the material that alienates you is deposited in the body. Removing decades of fat you remove the "Self" from its impediments to be reconnected with the body. Start thinking about fasting and wait for the right moment. Your body has its own indicators; it will signal when it is the right time to start fasting. Fasting is not a mere physical fact. It is changing the spirit of a time that has become stranger to us and that lives in us in order to alienate us to ourselves. Impossible to fast, without implying a change of the inner spirit. Those who fasted in the Old Testament did so to invoke great changes in life. Jesus himself fasted for forty nights and forty days and after fasting he was ready and strong enough to resist the devil and was ripe for his minist...

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...