Skip to main content

Io non mi sento italiano




Una canzone di Giorgio Gaber diceva:

Io non mi sento italiano
...
questa nostra Patria
non so che cosa sia
...
non vedo alcun motivo
per essere orgogliosi
...
Questo bel Paese
pieno di poesia
ha tante pretese
ma nel nostro mondo occidentale
è la periferia


Forse non saremo la periferia estrema, ma come tutte le periferie siamo poco creativi, innovativi, smidollati, senza centro, abulici, disorientati, vegetativi, un po' zombi...
Ma chi ci rappresenta (chi rappresenta questa periferia), il nostro primo ministro, supera ogni aspettativa.
Più volte vedendo le smorfie (da idiota) i contorcimenti facciali, le espressioni ebetiche del volto mi chiedo se il nostro premier sia affetto (più o meno leggermente) da asperger.
Lo sospetto ma non ne sono certo.
Se lo fosse almeno avrebbe una scusa plausibile.

Uno dei ritornelli più comuni fra gli italiani una volta era "Ma perché l'avete votato?".
Ora non possiamo dire nemmeno questo, il sistema che governa il mondo ce lo ha imposto.
Il terzo colpo di stato (dopo Napolitano e Monti) incruento (a differenza della Turchia) in Italia, in meno di un decennio.
Però in tutta onestà mi chiedo come possa, chi lo ha favorito lo appoggia e lo sostiene, aver lo stomaco di guardare siffatta creatura. 
Le sue interviste internazionali in lingua inglese rassomigliano in modo impressionante al comico americano Jerry Lewis.

Ma almeno lui lo faceva per lavoro. 
Il nostro premier lo fa solo per esibizionismo, credo. Non vedo altrimenti la necessità di assumere simili pose davanti a giornalisti allibiti e ironici (al limite di ridergli in faccia).

Dunque quei poteri forti che lo sostengono si chiederanno mai che idiota, nel senso anche etimologico del termine (singolare), abbiano messo al posto di comando?

O forse lo hanno scelto proprio per aver bene inteso l'essenza del popolo italiano: a Firenze, quando era sindaco, mi dicono che lo chiamassero "palle di segatura".
Uno evidentemente poco coraggioso: come il suo popolo, che nemmeno lo ha scelto a rappresentarlo.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fasting to reconnect your "Self" to your body

If there is a discrepancy between yourself and the body, between what you are and what you don't feel you are in your body, then fast, because there is excess to remove in the body. Through the stratifications of fat, the material that alienates you is deposited in the body. Removing decades of fat you remove the "Self" from its impediments to be reconnected with the body. Start thinking about fasting and wait for the right moment. Your body has its own indicators; it will signal when it is the right time to start fasting. Fasting is not a mere physical fact. It is changing the spirit of a time that has become stranger to us and that lives in us in order to alienate us to ourselves. Impossible to fast, without implying a change of the inner spirit. Those who fasted in the Old Testament did so to invoke great changes in life. Jesus himself fasted for forty nights and forty days and after fasting he was ready and strong enough to resist the devil and was ripe for his minist...

Poetry dwells near the divine light's breath

  The comparison between poetry and divine light that we proposed HERE finds its perfect explanation in Saint Paul, Letters to the Romans I,19: τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ ⸂θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν , what can be known of God was manifested to them (in men), indeed God manifested to them. Poetry unveils in the human being the need to be human, i.e.the need for Beauty, for feeling the Beauty in itself and with itself, and this feeling is supported by the divine light. As we are influenced by the idea of Saint Augustine of saeculum , we maintain that poetry belongs to the saeculum and therefore stops on the threshold of the divine light [ I] without crossing that threshold, but it senses the light beyond that threshold. We are taken to that threshold by the human feeling of Beauty within us that leads us up to there: up to that door that it is not possible to cross in our being human, but nevertheless, the very dwelling on that threshold is illuminated by the ve...

Similarities between Lithuanian, Sanskrit and Ancient Greek: the sigmatic future

by Fabrizio Ulivieri Lithuanian is the most archaic among all the Indo-European languages spoken today, and as a result it is very useful, indeed, indispensable in the study of Indo-European linguistics. The most important fact is that Lithuanian is not only very archaic, but still very much alive, i. e., it is spoken by about three and a half million people. It has a rich tradition in folklore, in literature, and it is used very successfully in all walks of modern life, including the most advanced scientific research. Forced by our interest for this piece of living archaism, we go deeper in our linguistic survey. One of the most noticeable similarities is the future (- sigmatic future -). Lithuanian has preserved a future tense from prehistoric times: it has one single form, e.g. kalbė-siu 'I will speak', etc. kalbė-si kalbė-s kalbė-sime kalbė-site kalbė-s This form kalbėsiu is made from the stem kalbė-(ti) 'to speak', plus the ancient stem-end...